| Papers [1-10] of 2753 :: [Page 1 of 276] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 —> | |
|
|
Business - International, 2008.
A review of three articles "Oceania: Government Orders Fish Company to Shut Down" published in 'The Pacific Magazine', "Asia: Protesters Tell Wal-Mart to Quit India" by Nandini Lakshman and "South America: New South American Bank Planned" by James Ingham.
1,017 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses three different articles about business decisions made by the Palau Government of Oceania, Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez, and the inhabitants of Maharashtra, India. The paper comments on the influence these decisions had on international management. The three articles discussed are "Oceania: Government Orders Fish Company to Shut Down" published in 'The Pacific Magazine', "Asia: Protesters Tell Wal-Mart to Quit India" by Nandini Lakshman and "South America: New South American Bank Planned" by James Ingham.
Outline:
Article Review
Influence on International Management
South America: New South American Bank Planned
Article Review
Influence on International Management
Asia: Protesters Tell Wal-Mart to Quit India
Article Review
Influence on International Management
From the Paper
" On the other hand, the protests in Asia impact the international managers in the meaning that they increase the awareness in regard to the problems posed on positioning their products onto a foreign country. International managers will better analyze the cultural features of their destination region and the businesses that are being developed there. In order for these companies to properly function within the new territory, they must not pose a threat to local businesses and they should present the population with products that can not be produced internally."
| |
|
Vietnam War, 2008.
An outline and synopsis of the Vietnam war.
824 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the reasons for American intervention in Vietnam, including a synopsis of presidents in office during and after this time, and their ideas of what was important to the American people and nation at or about the time of the war. This paper also describes the lessons of the Vietnam War and its consequences on American foreign policy.
From the Paper
" Entire villages had been wiped out, people, innocent civilians, not just soldiers, which is one reason the United States had reason to feel disgraced and failed to distinguish the returning soldiers from the war as heroes. This in turn took a tremendous toll on many soldiers resulting in post traumatic syndromes including long-lasting depression, aggression and sleep disorders. No other war had exacted such a toll on domestic and foreign life than did the war in Vietnam. Had the troops remained, there is no question the country as it is today would still exist, although what does exist is a small fracture or reminder of a land that used to be. Even after the war landmines were still prevalent throughout Vietnam resulting in even more deaths among the innocent."
| |
|
The US and Chinese Human Rights, 2008.
A persuasive essay that the United States should apply greater pressure on China to improve its human rights practices.
823 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper asserts that the United States only refuses to impose strict economic sanctions on China because economic interests prevail over democratic principles. The paper relates that the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre forced the then President Bush to impose economic sanctions on China, but these sanctions were later reduced and have little impact anymore. The paper argues that despite the economic interests involved, the US must still assure that the Chinese government change its policy and improve its human rights practices.
From the Paper
"China is one of the few existing communist countries in the world and it has known a rapid growth in the past decades, economically speaking. Considering the growing economy and the large population, China is one of the important actors on the international scene. It is important for US to develop close relationships with China, especially in economic terms. However, the continuous disrespect and constant proofs of human rights breaking in China make it impossible for the United States, as one of the strongest advocates of human rights, to ignore the issue and develop normal economic relations with China."
| |
|
U.S. Foreign Policy, 2008.
An analysis of the role of the U.S. and Great Britain in the outbreak of the Cold War.
1,058 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the revisionist views of Walter LaFeber, Arnold Offner and John Gaddis with regards to the outbreak of the Cold War. It specifically focuses on their claim that the USA and Great Britain were also responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War, as their strategy of foreign policy was short-sighted and, in many respects, lacked responsibility for the future.
From the Paper
"Drawing a conclusion, it's important to note that the ideas of revisionist authors such as Walter LaFeber, Arnold Offner and John Gaddis are based on rationalism, yet evaluation of definite political issues is made from the perspective of people who are free of "western propaganda". The cold war was inevitable already, at the end of WWII, as both super powers revealed its potential, which was hidden and undervalued in pre-war years. The Marshall Plan, which in many respects accelerated the coming of the Cold War, was also inevitable, due to the popularity of communist and socialist ideas in France, Italy and Germany, especially in years of reconstruction, when European nations lacked economic stability and bearable conditions of living. The collapse of the colonial system with its unpredictable circumstances was also more a fault of former empires, than a fault of the USA, as none of the empires appeared able to control political and social processes in their former colonies."
| |
|
Great Powers, 2008.
The writer examines the concept of a great power and discusses states in terms of major powers.
1,658 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 9 sources, APA, $ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at how, in order to ascertain the degree to which states exercise their power, it is first necessary to properly analyze the components which define great powers - that is the political, military, and, most importantly, economic components. The writer then discusses several theories that quantify power in terms of these components, noting that there have been numerous examples of great powers that have exercised their political, military, and economic influence throughout the centuries. Next, the writer examines the current international scene and asserts that, at this time, the international scene is not dominated by a great power, nor should it be. The paper concludes that, while there have been numerous examples of great powers that have exercised their political, military, and economic influence throughout the centuries, at this time, and taking into account the current evolutions in international affairs in terms of security, financial supremacy and political diversity, it is hard to find a state that would fit the traditional definition of a great power.
From the Paper
"However, the range of their power cannot be compared to any subsequent definitions of the term great power due to the fact that at the time, the Hellenistic world was considered to be the only one available for states to claim. In this sense, one cannot look at the magnitude of their influence but from a military perspective. Nonetheless, in all confrontations that took place at the time victory resulted in the political domination of the adversary. The Macedonian empire under the rule of Alexander exercised complete political control over the territories it conquered. Even so, neither example can be certified as being but regional powers because of the limited amount of time they manifested their dominance."
| |
|
The Oil Industry, 2008.
An analysis of the history of oil production and the impact of the oil industry on the international economy.
3,837 words (approx. 15.3 pages), 13 sources, MLA, $ 105.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the oil industry and how it affects international relations and the international economy. It also discusses the history and background of oil use and production. In addition, the paper discusses the impact of oil production, as well as other economic factors relating to the industry. The paper then discusses current and future challenges to the oil industry.
Table of Contents:
The Oil Industry: Background And History
Key Issues That Are Related To International Economy
The Oil Industry's Impact On The International Economy
Future Challenges For The Industry
Conclusion
From the Paper
"A significant aspect is the way that oil impacts on the economic relationship between countries. An increase in the price of oil can alter the balance of trade between counties and also affects exchange rates. This refers to the scenario in which the oil-importing countries experience a decline in their balance of payments. This exerts a negative pressure on exchange rates and results in the increase in the price of imports and a reduction in the value of exports. This in turn leads to a decline in the national income of that country. All of these facets have a long-term impact on the economy of countries. "The economic and energy policy response to a combination of higher inflation, higher unemployment, lower exchange rates and lower real output also affects the overall impact on the economy over the longer term" (Analysis of the Impact of High Oil Prices on the Global Economy)"
| |
|
The English System - Order out of Chaos, 2008.
An analysis of the theories of the English School of International Relations with regards to order versus chaos.
2,260 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 69.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the English School of International Relations' stress upon cooperation and order, rather than upon chaos, within the international system. It discusses their theories and their arguments and then specifically looks at why according to the English School of International Relations, there is such a high degree of order in the international system.
From the Paper
"Within these spheres of overlap there is also a possibility to cement as well as destabilize a nation and a world. An American of Jewish origin may support the existence of Israel, for example, and draw attention to the plight of the Middle East, stimulating interest in this region of the world within his or her own nation. An economic alliance between two corporations generates a community, and a mutual interest in regional stability, as well as an opportunity of human beings working in a foreign land to better understand another culture. The potential for community ties thus is just as great as the potential of non-state communities to strain the borders of nations and to influence national politics--and thus, the 'center' does 'hold.'"
| |
|
The Rise of China, 2008.
Explores the possibility of peace, stability and prosperity of Southeast Asia, given the rise of China.
2,175 words (approx. 8.7 pages), 9 sources, APA, $ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper states that China has recovered its larger economic, political and military stature in East Asia and is becoming a major power in the world. This ominous development is of supreme concern and interest to the United States. The author discusses China's complex relationship with Taiwan and its apprehension about Japan's agreement with the United States on a theater missile defense (TMD) system and on launching spy satellites. The paper explains the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the concern of China about the nuclearization of India, Pakistan and North Korea.
From the Paper
"Although almost all states in the world signed the NPT, the world remained insecure and at the brink of nuclear proliferation and disaster. Observers and critics believe that preventing this would require States with nuclear capabilities to reconsider their stand on a higher moral standpoint and discard their nuclear modernization programs. Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea, for example, needed to terminate their respective programs and agendas, using nuclear weapons."
| |
|
The Soviet Bloc vs the West, 2008.
A discussion of the bipolar concept that represented the perceived structure of world politics during the Cold War.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explains the bipolar idea that depicts the world as divided into two camps, both militarily and ideologically, with the West representing democratic ideals and with the Soviet bloc representing Communism in opposition to democracy. The paper describes the era of the Cold War when the two sides engaged in an escalating arms race that lasted until the Soviet Union dissolved. The paper relates that today the process of globalization replaced the economic aspects of the bipolar world and terrorism and the globalization of the conflict in the Middle East has taken the place of the Soviet Union as the major threat to the West.
From the Paper
"The bipolar world that developed after World War II represented the basic perceived structure of world politics during the Cold War. The bipolar idea depicts the world as essentially divided into two camps, both militarily and ideologically, with the West representing democratic ideals, and with the Soviet bloc representing Communism in opposition to democracy. Much of the world divided between the two camps, with the two sides creating mutual defense pacts among member nations, and with much of the rhetoric of the age based on the clash of ideologies as well as images of a military threat from the other side."
| |
|
Max Boot, 2008.
A review of the book, "The Savage Wars of Peace: Small Wars and the Rise of American Power" by Max Boot.
4,530 words (approx. 18.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 118.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper states that Max Boot's book, "The Savage Wars of Peace: Small Wars and the Rise of American Power," adopts the topic of recent works focusing upon the oftentimes overlooked conflicts in American history. The paper comments that Boot attempts to chronicle a history of the United States' more minor conflicts, yet he does so from a neoconservative and neo-imperial perspective. The paper notes that Boot claims that small conflicts, which are typically those over colonies are necessary to the overall creation and survival of an empire. Boot, by documenting the success and failures of the United States' military machine over the past several centuries, attempts to generate a picture of how American power has expanded and been sustained. To Boot, these conflicts are central toward the creation of empire, and they become increasingly inevitable as the United States assumes the role of a global police force, as well as a massive economic entity, possessing vast corporate interests abroad.
From the Paper
"Other authors, most notably Sam Sarkesian, have termed the wars Boot focuses upon "forgotten" wars. Essentially, the overlooked wars of America's past have landed in an obscure place in history specifically because they were unsuccessful and unconventional: they were not the grand, strategic battles of the First or Second World Wars. This, it would seem, is one of Boot's major motivations for focusing upon these conflicts: they are little-known and little understood. Yet, according to Boot, they provide valuable lessons militaristically and diplomatically for the present and the future; after all, Boot believes that such wars are, on the whole, unavoidable."
|
|
|